My Wikitinerary: Day 3 at Wikimania DC
We have arrived at the last day (of official events) at Wikimania, which begins shortly with an opening plenary by the Wikimedia Foundation's executive director, Sue Gardner. As expected, my Wikimania attendance yesterday was limited on account of other obligations; today I'll be around for most of the events. Here are a few of the panels and presentations I'm interested in today:
♦ ♦ ♦
10:30 - 11:50
Title: Getting elected thanks to Wikipedia. Social network influence on politics. Speaker: Damian Finol Category: Wikis and the Public Sector Description: Wikipedia and politicians is a contentious topic—one I wrote about for Campaigns & Elections in April 2010. This seems to be a bit different: it will be focused on Venezuelan politics, but the question: does having a good Wikipedia page help win elections? is one I'd like to hear how others would answer.
Title: Iterate your cross-pollinated strategic synergy, just not on my Wikipedia! Speaker: Tom Morris Category: WikiCulture and Community Description: Like any small community focused on a unique project, Wikipedia and its Wikimedia sister projects have developed a kind of jargon all its own. This talk will focus on the language used on WMF and how it can be simplified for clarity, especially to encourage participation of new editors and non-native English speakers.
Title: Wikimedia on social media Speaker: Jeromy-Yu Chan, Tango Chan, Slobodan Jakoski, Kiril Simeonovski, Guillaume Paumier, Naveen Francis, Christophe Henner Category: WikiCulture and Community Description: As I tweeted the other day, English-speaking Wikipedians are often disdainful of Facebook, for reasons that would take some time to unpack. Twitter too was disfavored for the similar service Identi.ca—the latter is open source, a plus for many—although I think the Twitter has gained a share of acceptance by now. Indeed, the proceedings of Wikimania have been heavily tweeted, just like any conference. So: "The goal of this panel is to share experience on the use of social media throughout the Wikimedia movement, and to share best practices to collectively improve our use of these communication channels." What are best practices now?
12:10 -13:30
Title: What does THAT mean? Engineering jargon and procedures explained Speaker: Sumana Harihareswara and possibly Rob Lanphier or additional members of the engineering staff of the Wikimedia Foundation Category: Technology and Infrastructure Description: Speaking of jargon, this is supposed to be a non-techie explanation of the technical aspects of Wikimedia. As a non-techie, I could stand for someone to explain how Wikipedia uses squids to me again.
Title: The bad assumptions of the copyright discussion; Blacking out Wikipedia Speaker: James Alexander; panel Category: Wikis and the Public Sector Description: January's Wikipedia blackout in protest of proposed U.S. legislation tightening copyright and intellectual property enforcement on the web (SOPA and PIPA) was very controversial, and remains so. Jimmy Wales, in his opening plenary, addressed the issue, suggesting blackouts would be considered only for similar issues. The first talk is shorter and appears to be on the issue of copyright. The panel is longer and will discuss the decision to blackout, and how the blackout worked, how the blackout page was designed and the media's response.
14:30 - 15:50
Title: 11 years of Wikipedia, or the Wikimedia history crash course you can edit Speaker: Guillaume Paumier Category: WikiCulture and Community Description: Exactly what it sounds like, a history lesson on the last 11 year years of Wikimedia/pedia history. This is a 70 minute talk. Having read Andrew Lih's "The Wikipedia Revolution" and Andrew Dalby's "The World and Wikipedia" there is probably not much here I won't know about already, but I still find it interesting nonetheless.
Title: The end of notability Speaker: David Goodman Category: WikiCulture and Community Description: Notability, on Wikipedia, refers to a widely-discussed guideline which recommends whether a given subject deserves a standalone Wikipedia article or not. It is very contentious, it is the inspiration for the ideological split between inclusionists and deletionists, and was a key focus of John Siracusa in the "Hypercritical" podcast episode I wrote about earlier this year. This talk will focus on the topic of notability guidelines and how we can't always find two reliable sources providing substantial coverage for some topics that probably should have articles. Goodman seems to be suggesting that we have articles on topics people want information about regardless of standard notability, but with a twist: should there be a "Wikipedia Two" to satisfy the many non-notable college athletes and politicians whose fans and supporters would like to create articles about them. Plus, Goodman (DGG on Wikipedia) is a bit of a character, so that should be interesting, too.
♦ ♦ ♦
OK, I've got to race down to the GWU campus now if I'm to catch Gardner's talk. Look for me on Twitter as @thewikipedian, and I'll write more here soon!